Next OSADL Events:
|
Breaking News:
2010-03-10 12:00
Parallel real-time on multi-core systems with mainline LinuxSeveral tasks simultaneously running at real-time priority no longer interfere to each other!
2010-02-22 12:00
"Latest Stable" Linux mainline real-time 2.6.31 is out!Kernel 2.6.31.12-rt21 is our latest and greatest
2010-02-21 12:00
OSADL at the Embedded World 2010Industry needs Open Source - Open Source meets Industry
2010-02-09 12:00
Spinlock annotations merged from the realtime tree to Linux mainline in 2.6.33Raw spinlocks are the "real" spinlocks now
2010-02-08 12:00
Prof Eben Moglen on "GNU GPL Version 3: The Law Making Process"International Conference on Commons, Users, Service Providers Internet (Self-)Regulation and Copyright
2009-11-23 12:00
Added a new HOWTO to the OSADL Website: Use BuildRoot to create a Linux image for QEMUGuest Editor Bogdan Cristea tells us about rapid prototyping of an embedded system using virtualization |
OSADL Project: Real Time Linux Workshops
Real Time Linux Foundation Workshops since 1999
Real Time Linux Workshops
1999 - 2000 - 2001 - 2002 - 2003 - 2004 - 2005 - 2006 - 2007 - 2008 - 2009
Ninth Real-Time Linux Workshop on November 2 to 4, 2007, in Linz, Austria
Announcement - Agenda - Paper Presentations
Assessment of the Realtime Preemption Patches (RT-Preempt) and their impact on the general purpose performance of the system
Arther Siro, Carsten Emde, Nicholas McGuire
With the maturing of the Realtime Preemption Patches (RT-Preempt) and their stepwise integration into the Mainline Linux kernel since version 2.6.18, we set out to answer the questions: - How good is RT-Preempt with respect to the worst-case latency? - How expensive is RT-Preempt with respect to a possible performance degradation of the system?
Taking that a lot of the preemption techniques deployed have their origin in scalability demands and not so much in realtime requirements, the most interesting case to look into is related to uni-processors - on these we would expect the worst-case impact of RT-Preempt. To answer the question, we ran an extensive benchmark series on 2.8-GHz P4 and 1-GHz VIA CIII boards, measuring general OS performance parameters as well as the realtime capabilities. For the latter, a trivial parport toggle program was used. The results show that high-end CPUs are well supported by RT-preempt in general. Low-end systems typically of interest for automation and control, however, still need some work.
In this paper we will outline the method used for evaluation and present the details of the results. This work was partly supported by the Open Source Automation Development Lab (OSADL).

